Tuesday, December 1, 2015

#44 Compose and create an mp3 of a song using Garage Band and LittleBits KORG

Check it out!

My video for the #44 Compose and create an mp3 of a song using Garage Band and LittleBits KORG task is done!



Here's the YT link: https://youtu.be/xskMEwGNyQg

The song I chose to play is the tune of "Rain, Rain, Go Away".

Instruments used:
LittleBits KORG Guitar Kit
Drummer iPad App
Big Baby Taylor Acoustic Guitar
Keyboard

Recorded and Compiled with Garageband & Final Cut Pro X

I apologize in advance if the song gets stuck in your head and you go crazy for the rest of the week. *Insert evil laughter* But I decided on this tune based on the tools that I had. Mainly, the LittleBits KORG Guitar had enough keys to play an entire octave. It is possible to play more than an octave by tweaking the octave or pitch dial. However, once you switch octaves or pitches it would be quite difficult to switch back to the original octave or pitch while recording a song because there is no indicator that tells you what pitch you're at. So to simplify it, I choose a song that could be played within an octave and did not exceed that. Based on this limitation, nursery rhymes came to mind as the perfect music to play and record. They are short, sweet, mostly within an octave, and extremely easy to learn and play.

I also originally considered incorporating the theremin into this jam session but I realized that the song would be overwhelmed with too many leading instruments and not enough supporting or complementary instruments. And I wouldn't be able to fit the theremin section (fifth) into the video symmetrically. That would have really bothered me.

Also, I don't have perfect pitch and had to figure out the chords to the random LittleBits pitches by ear. So in the second and third variations, I was quite off with my acoustic guitar and keyboard. But it was close enough for me as I could not perfect it in the limited time. So I apologize to those with pitch perfect hearing!

With that said, enjoy the video. If you really love the song and wish to download it and put it on repeat for your listening pleasure, here is the MP3:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B19UQAXzTNLwNWNTVHpjQVowXzQ/view?usp=sharing

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

12. Reflection

REFLECTION
Again, not much discussion in class this week (unless I was so engrossed in studio time that I didn't hear it, in which case, sorry!). Anyhow, I was trying to get started on compiling my LittleBits KORG MP3 video together during studio time and had to upgrade my Final Cut Pro X because I hadn't done that since I upgraded to El Capitan. So that took a while. Once it was up and running I got started on importing my videos and started putting them together. I didn't get to finish it in class as it would take probably about 3-4 hours to complete. But I can't wait to get the video out asap!

For some discussion and thought:
While I was making my video (or whenever I am in video/photo production), I have this thing where I don't like people watching me while my projects are in production. I don't know what it is but I just don't want people to see how I do it or see the unfinished product. I don't think it is because I don't want people to learn how to do what I do, I would gladly explain it and show the techniques on how to do it but I think I am very self-conscious about showing something that is still a work in progress and is unfinished. If it was meant to be incomplete and a long-term work in progress then that's fine, I guess. But if it has a deadline and I plan to publish the final product, I want people to have fresh eyes for the final product and not ruin it by being exposed to the work in progress. I guess it's like those behind-the-scenes videos. After you watch the actual movie, then watching the behind-the-scenes video would make sense and you would appreciate it more. But before that, I wouldn't release the behind-the-scenes video before or at the same time as the actual movie. Does that make sense? Do any of you have this feeling too? Do you think this is against the typical characteristics of a maker and against the Maker Manifesto? Or do you think this is just a personality thing and is unrelated to the open and sharing culture of the Maker movement?


READING SUMMARY
No readings this week! Woo!


END OF SEMESTER SUMMARY
Well, since this is our last blog entry, I think this warrants a summary reflection of how I felt about this class throughout the entire semester. Before the semester started I had a lot of concepts about what this class was about. Actually I had a lot of concepts about what the term "Makers" and "Makerspaces" meant. I think it was just one of those many SI groups and school organizations that people kept promoting but it really wasn't anything I was interested in so I never really looked into it. I saw many event posts that said this like "Maker Movement", "Find out what a Maker is", "Be a Maker", etc, etc but because there wasn't an initial brief description that caught my eye, I was by default uninterested. When this class was announced, I glanced through the email and thought it sounded interesting but very electronics oriented. Additionally, due to my prejudice from previous exposure, I thought, why do we need a class to make stuff like this and how does it relate to HCI or make me a better UX Designer? I no longer feel a burning sense to find an answer to this question. I think whether the Maker Movement is related to HCI or not is no longer an important question to me. This is because I have been exposed to this new field and I find it so fascinating and have since grown a more conscious and explicit passion for it (I say "explicit" here because I've always had passion to make stuff, I just didn't know that it was a whole movement).

Anyhow, taking this class has introduced to me many other areas in the maker movement. I have learned and picked up a few skills here and there that I would not have if I just continued on my own solitary maker way. I really appreciate that. On my own, I can learn whatever I want to learn but I would not have been pushed to learn something I thought I wasn't interested in. I learned more about fibers, Arduinos, C/C++ programming, Lilypads, paints, LittleBits KORG, 3D Printing, Baking, Fashion & Tech, Squishy Circuits, stencil cutters, board game design, and so much more. Sure, I did it for the points to get an A in this class but at the same time it was so much fun! Not just fun in 'playing' but fun in learning. It was fun to advance in the things I already knew how to do and it was fun learning things outside of my comfort zone, which I wouldn't have done without being awarded points. It just expands the horizon of all the things I can actually do and make on my own. This class has really opened up a whole new world that I actually have already been involved in but just didn't know it yet. So thank you, Professor Kristin. Thank you for showing me this new yet so very familiar world.

Now, my last question is, where can I go from here? Can I make this my career? If yes, what can I do? Is everything non-profit like only organizing and volunteering at Maker Faires? I would like to know where I can find a future career in the Maker Movement.

***


XTRA TO SHARE

I didn't discover anything new this week so nothing to share. But feel free to comment below if you found something cool!

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

11. Reflection

REFLECTION
We didn't have too much discussion in class this past week but I really liked the Potato Piano Mayank put together. That was really cool. I wished the application had incorporated more keys into the piano though so that we could make music with more than 4 notes. But nevertheless, I think it is so amazing to experience how our body can conduct electricity and complete electronic circuits without us feeling anything flowing through (except when one gets electrocuted). Seemingly, nothing is happening, but in actuality, the current is flowing.

I would have liked to have tried making something with the Lilipad and conductive thread but I really wanted to finish the movie review I had been putting off for such a long time. Perhaps I might pick that up in the last two classes we have but we shall see. I am planning on finishing the last movie review and one more project. Quite excited to do them but I'm a big procrastinator right now since it's the end of the semester. I'll have to find some motivation through Shia LaBeouf's "Just Do It" video.



A more intense version:



READING SUMMARY
No readings this week! Woo!

***

XTRA TO SHARE
Has anyone watched The Martian yet? If you haven't you should watch it before reading on but I'll try not to spoil it for you. If you have, highlight the paragraph below to read my thoughts about it.

I just watched it this past week! It was awesome! Don't you just think "Maker" when you watched how Matt Damon created his own little green house and grew his own potatoes on Mars? So resourceful! First he needed food, so he counted how much he had. It was not enough so he needed to grow food and he found food that he could grow. Then he needed a place to grow it so he built his own greenhouse out of the station he had and used extremely natural fertilizer. Then he needed water, so he made water! Simply amazing! I don't know if this would ever fly on Mars today but it sure is a very interesting and plausible experiment I think NASA should try (if they haven't already. Lol.)


I saw this MIT research on Facebook and thought it is exactly what Adidas is doing to with bacteria too in The Next Black documentary: https://www.facebook.com/techinsider/videos/430925567105805/

#405 Movie Night! The Next Black (The Future of Clothing)

The Next Black (2014) by AEG is a documentary film about the people behind the scenes not merely in the fashion industry but even in the making of future clothing. Split into six progressing chapters depicting the innovative direction of clothing, this 45-minute film tells the story of interweaving garments and technology for fashion and for sports, increasing sustainability by growing materials and by changing buying habits, and reducing waste and pollution through less harmful means of dyeing and through repair, reuse, and recycle. Each chapter is excellently opened with the elegant use of asian-styled calligraphy paintings. Accompanied by the expressive narration, these beautiful visuals engage the viewers' imagination in the absence of appropriate real-life imagery.

Through the sleek cinematography permeated with aesthetic close-up shots of fabric texture, sewing tools, thread spools, the spread of dye in water, sewing machines in action and the likes, The Next Black inspires us with interviews from Nancy Lilbury of Studio XO, Matt Hymers of Adidas, Suzanne Lee of Biocouture, Rick Ridgeway of Patagonia, Sophie Mather of YEH Group, and Kyle Wiens and Brittany McCrigler of iFixit. Each of these hidden icons are passionate and determined to propel and advance the fashion industry with technology, sustainability, and through means of repair.

The first pair, Nancy Lilbury (Studio XO) and Matt Hymers (Adidas), address the idea of "wearable tech" by merging fashion and tech as well as the idea of smart clothes. They show us how much actual design engineering and 3D printing technology can be and is being applied into contemporary fashion for beauty and awe while heart rate sensors and accelerometers are integrated into sports gear to improve performance in the sports entertainment industry. Though Lady Gaga in a bubble dress is definitely a sight to behold, there is the question as to how durable and reasonable it is for regular citizens to be wearing hard and tough 3D printed fashion items as a norm. Similarly, although super tight sports jerseys with integrated heart sensors are a step forward in the sports world, the unbearable sense of tightness and constraint for the sportsmen also incur undesirable consequences such as cutting off the sleeves of a £500 handmade shirt. We can also see the same uncomfortableness with the recent change in American football attire which has tighten up significantly to expose many of the sportsmen's bounding bellies. However, there is an interesting segway into the next subject when Adidas also shows the use of bacteria on gill- or scale-like patterns in the shirts to increase breathability and perspiration during exercise of sports. Something that is very useful in the near future.

Suzanne Lee (Biocouture) and Rick Ridgeway (Patagonia), speak on the topics of sustainability through brewing sustainable fabrics and preventing material waste in fast fashion. Lee is fervently interested in using bacteria to grow material to be used to make clothes. The basic recipe includes green tea, sugar, acetic acid, and a starter culture (yeast and bacteria). A very interesting concept indeed but to be honest, such methods and its products are slightly alarming as it reminds of kombucha, a fermented (not to mention pungent) tea drink commonly used as functional beverages for unsubstantiated health benefits. My skepticism is somewhat proven by the way the fabric is smelled and its corresponding comment "there's no smell really once its been dyed". Well, that's what they all say. But regardless of my personal opinions on the matter, this is definitely an untrodden path that Suzanne is very admirably venturing into. It would be very interesting to see what comes out of it in the next few years and whether it is a material that is not only more sustainable but also durable. Ridgeway on the other hand strives to create awareness on the fact that it's not just the company's responsibility to prevent material waste, it is also the consumer's responsibility. Through a Black Friday ad, Patagonia encourages customers with the thought "don't buy it if you don't need it" and pushes towards an attitude to buy high quality items that will last longer and when it is damaged, repair it and reuse it. Definitely an attractive and wise attitude to adopt but whether this Black Friday ad carries hidden intentions disguised as a genuine care for the earth, we will never know but can only ponder.

It is a little ironic how in these two chapters, we are trying to make sustainable material out of bacteria to reduce waste but at the same time, Patagonia talks about preventing waste by repairing and reusing clothing items to keep them longer. I assume material made out of bacteria is not meant to last long as it may disintegrate faster than the regular fabric in order to be a kind of sustainable material to reduce pollution when thrown away in the long run. So how do you or even why should you repair and reuse something that is not meant to be kept for long? On the other hand, perhaps on the more realistic side of things, these two seemingly opposite ideas do go hand in hand in the sense that we don't try to repair and reuse the clothing made from living organisms but we do try to repair and reuse the material that are not as sustainable.

Thus, we are led into the last two chapters of the documentary, Sophie Mather (YEH Group), and Kyle Wiens and Brittany McCrigler (iFixit). Mather begins with a story that leaves a vivid impression about her love for watermelons and her disgust after she witnessed the polluted river water used to feed and grow said watermelons. This experience led her to press towards a method of dyeing without water. This approach reduces water pollution because it does not use a single drop of water. Wiens and McCrigler further impress us with the human ability in learning to fix things. They claim that when you fix something, you become more connected to your products and it becomes part of your skills, learning, and persona that wouldn't be if you were just to buy a new jacket. Instead of being something I bought, it now becomes something I own.

In conclusion, the overall message from this film is that the direction of fashion is changing and moving towards the integrating of technology, changing the buying culture, and increasing sustainability while reducing waste. Specifically in regards to the idea that we should learn to buy less but longer-lasting products, personally, I applaud this way of thinking and am all for it but in reality, how feasible is this way of life?

Consider these things:
1. People already have this shopaholic habit ingrained into them,
2. People have this innate need to always acquire new things,
3. There's always greedy people out there. Production and marketing will always strive for more sales, more profit with disregard for the sustainability of the earth, and
4. These type of high-tech fashion items will be initially expensive which will deter many and create a negative first impression of the inability to ever afford them. Thus, there is a need to gain traction in this market before it can really take off at full scale.

Regardless of these concerns, there is also the fact that people change, habits can be changed, and companies go where the money goes which is still in the hands of the people. If the cost of purchasing these futuristic items could be borne initially by these makers and their sponsors so that wearable tech can gain traction, this whole movement can definitely move forward.

However, this is a battle and it needs to be fought tactfully and strategically. We can't just run into it full force and hope to win. In other words, we can't just throw all these new products into market and expect it to take off on its own. Because that would result in a collapse and utter failure. People need time to have their concepts changed. People need even more time to have their habits changed. It may take at least another generation to turn the entire ship in a different direction. But it can be done if done properly.

----
Additional Assignment Question:
Are any of the innovators in the video doing work that interests you to pursue? If so, who and why? If not, what would you like to see people researching when it comes to the future of fashion?

I am particularly interested in iFixit's work. I think it is necessary to have some kind of open source place to collect high quality information that is easily accessible to everyone so that people can learn how to do things themselves instead of outsource and pay for a service they can easily learn on their own. IFixit used to only be a website but a few years ago they extended into a mobile app. I find it convenient to have it on my phone but it is a little small and hard to see. The optimal device though is the iPad or iPad mini. In any case, iFixit is definitely a life saver and I believe having the general public as contributors is also an excellent source of information.

Friday, November 13, 2015

10. Reflection

REFLECTION
It was interesting to hear about the Maker Faire at Barnes & Nobles from Alyssa and everybody else's opinion about it. It sounds like it was something very quickly put together and not very centered on making but rather on sales at the bookstore. I wasn't there so I can't say for sure, but in an attempt to be balanced in thought, I think it is expected that the B&N staff would default to selling stuff because that's all they were trained to do. It's like this Maker Faire was just thrown onto them and they're just doing the job they were hired to do. So in all fairness, I don't think it was their fault for trying to sell things at the Faire. Also, the Maker Movement contains a type of open culture that not everybody is familiar with. People in general are used to fending for themselves and trying their best to please everybody in whatever they do. But the Maker Movement doesn't care about that. We care about sharing thoughts and ideas and skills and teaching others what we know. We care about just making cool, fun, useful (and sometimes not that useful) stuff but it is definitely something we find interesting and have passion for. This culture is something that will take time and needs to be gradually exposed to the community at these bookstores and even into the staff there to ingrain it in them. In any case, I am not surprised that the Faire did not turn out to resemble a real Faire as much. I had hoped it would have been exactly like a real Faire but I didn't expect it to be one. But at least it's a start. Get the event going, work on perfecting it. 

READING SUMMARY

Browsing through sewelectric.org and the T-Shirt Fashion Pinterest search, there is some really cool stuff out there that could be done. I like how Sew Electric brings together these 3 areas of craft, electronics, and programming (sounds like "Maker" to me!). I am curious to see what "the monster who sings when you hold its hands" looks like.

It was very interesting to see the technological approach and advancement in the fashion industry in The Next Black. I like to see how technology can be incorporated in a useful and practical way into clothing items and even make them still look good. Particularly of interest to me was the use of bacteria on sports attire to open and close the gill- or scale-like patterns based on the body functions. It was also cool to see the use of simple wiring to measure heart rates and other stats. I'm kind of skeptical about the use of bacteria to grow clothing material though. Not that I don't think they can do it because they can and have been working on it. But the thought of putting on a suit of bacteria on my body is kind of strange... and a little gross. Maybe I'm just prejudiced and maybe this would be the norm in the near future and there would be no issues on the matter. Well, we'll see how it plays out. I was also impressed with how actual engineering was incorporated into Lady Gaga's bubble dress. I knew they did it but I just never paid attention and did not think about the details of how the dress was made. It is very cool to know that it was 3D printed too. Additionally, Patagonia's approach to Black Friday sales ad was also interesting. I think it's great that they are advocating that it's not just the production company's responsibility to take care of the environment and prevent material waste but it's also the responsibility of the buyer or customer to not buy things they don't need. Even they should learn to take proper care of items they already own and learn to fix them and repair them and reuse them. I think Patagonia, though painted in a protagonistic light, actually has a twofold intention. The first, they probably do have a real and genuine care or concern for the environment and preventing waste but on the other hand, I think they are also doing this for their own profit by appearing to be the "good guys" with the "out-of-the-box" thinking to discourage purchases on Black Friday. In actuality, they are making the customers trust them more and like them more even if they don't love the designs and therefore increasing customer retention. It's almost like reverse psychology. Take Nike for instance, sales went down when word got out about their China factory child labor. People still loved their designs and products but because they knew children were used to make them, they didn't feel good and even no longer wanted to purchase Nike products. Anyway, this doesn't really have anything to do with making or makers but it's just my thoughts on marketing for customer retention. Lastly, I was pleasantly surprised to see a couple of interviews from iFixit. I myself have been using iFixit for 4-5 years now to fix iPhones, iPods, iPads, and Macbooks. I first stumbled upon it when I damaged my iPhone 4 screen and refused to pay $300 to get it fixed at the Apple store. So I did a little research and found iFixit with clear instructions and photos to replace your own screen. It seemed very doable and I decided to try it. 2-3 hours later I successfully repaired my cracked screen with a $30 OEM part I got from Amazon. It was a great sense of accomplishment (check out my before and after photos of my iPhone 4 below)! Since then I have helped friends and family fix their broken Apple products (including broken speakers, microphones, cameras, earphone jacks, home buttons, power buttons, etc.) and I've gotten really good at it. I can now replace an iPhone 5 screen in 45 minutes if I take my time and I don't charge them any service fees. They only pay for the parts used. Anyway, iFixit is such a great available open resource with quality and accurate information. I haven't used iFixit for fixing things other than Apple products and the occasional Android phone but I'm pretty sure they are excellent across the board. It's great to see the faces behind iFixit in the documentary.

Photos of my damaged and first repair of my iPhone 4 using iFixit back in 2011:







***


XTRA TO SHARE

In line with our short side conversation in class today about linguistics, here is another interesting THNKR video:

This young man speaks over 20 languages: https://youtu.be/Km9-DiFaxpU



Lastly, not a maker thing but if you were curious about the video I shared professor Kristin about Malaysians and how we speak, here it is: https://youtu.be/ieZwYjMcP20

Monday, November 9, 2015

#65 Movie Night! Crafted Film Review

Crafted (2015) by Morgan Spurlock is a documentary on 3 very different groups of makers. It stars 5 individuals who have a passion to apply their skills into the things they enjoy making. Luke Snyder and David Van Wyk are a pair of professional knife-makers and blacksmiths in Arnoldsville, Georgia. Courtney Burns and Nick Balla create exquisite and delectable dishes from unique and local ingredients for their restaurant in San Francisco, California. Yuji Nagatani is a Japanese potter making household goods in Iga, Japan.

Beautifully encapsulated with twilight and sunrise sequences, Spurlock portrays the diligence and passion of these 5 makers and their handcrafted techniques. From hand-rolled knife handles and grandmother recipes of third-world countries to sculpted pots of rich natural clay, these individuals all display the same irreplaceable trait of "handmade". 

In Crafted, the viewer is brought into the life of these makers and brought through their process of making their specialized products. Snyder and Wyk started their business when word got out on Wyk's wife's blog about his knife-making hobby. Creating knives and knife handles out of objects of sentimental value, it has been their primary source of income since with over 18-month long waitlists. Their hands are the precious tools of the trade. If anything ever happens to them, they won't be able to feed their family. Burns and Balla, on the other hand, specialize in food. Specifically, they specialize in food made in developing, third-world countries that are made by grandmothers. They strive to use whole local produce and harbor their own preserved food experiments to be served in years to come. Furthermore, having been a potter for 50 years, Nagatani uses the rich organic mineral clay in Iga that had been buried under Old Lake Biwa 4 million years ago. Nagatani, the 7th head of the pottery workshop today, uses a large kiln to bake these clay pots. Earthquakes and natural disasters are a huge threat to his business. If one hits and damages the kiln, it imposes detrimental effects.

Though there are threats and risks in each of these three very different types of makings, it does not stop the determined makers in their endeavor to create products of high value and quality through their detailed and intricate respective processes. This film excellently depicts how each incorporate both art and science along with dedicated passion to produce their final products to share with the world.

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

9. Reflection

REFLECTION
Teaching a class an activity is a very interesting exercise and experience. I actually really enjoyed it. There's something about sharing your knowledge about how to do things and having people learn them. You feel the joy when you see them succeed and make something they really wanted to create. I thought I'd be doing a lot more talking and answering questions and explaining things but perhaps due to the nature of the task, there was not as much as I imagined. I was hoping more people would ask me more questions or bring up some ideas they'd like to try and we can try to plan or draft it together. But perhaps every one was busy trying to start the process. I hope every one had a good time. At least they seemed engrossed in what they were doing. We'll see in the upcoming classes how this will play out. I'm definitely looking forward to helping out more when we do actual painting! Quite exciting!


READING SUMMARY
No readings this week! Woo!

***

XTRA TO SHARE
A few weeks ago, I emailed the class with a couple of YouTube videos made by THNKR channel. I will repost them here as I still think about them every now and then and consider them according to Buechley's talk and other readings.

14 year old Kathryn rebuilding her own car: http://youtu.be/9vZpNQUIqIg
15 year old Kelvin building FM radios with electronic parts found from trash cans in Sierra Lione: http://youtu.be/XOLOLrUBRBY

#610 Built-In Arduino Examples

Below are the 6 built-in Arduino examples I did today in class. I thought they were supposed to be really difficult, confusing, and time-consuming but they were actually quite simple to construct, which was such a surprise to me. What I got out of them is that there are lots of possibilities with Arduino. The possibilities lie in your understanding of a little programming and electronics. But all you need is to start with an idea and there is so much open source available online. Without further ado, here are my 6 examples:

Example 1 Blink


Example 2 Push Button


Example 3 Push & Release Button


Example 4 Fade LED


Example 5 Brightness Control Button


Example 6 Analog Input

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

8. Reflection

REFLECTION
Our creativity warm up of the mummy hand was fun. Growing up in Malaysia where Halloween was not celebrated, I never had the exposure or opportunity to make these kinds of things. It was interesting how we had to wrap the tape around the curves of the hand and try not to get the fingers stuck together on the first round of tape. I think making the Star Trek hand would have been very cool and interesting to make sure the hand sign is obviously visible.


READING SUMMARY
From Kristin's blog post, I definitely agree that it would be super cool to have a State Fair type rather than a Science Fair. When I think Science Fair, I think of an indoor hall with small tables showing off cool gadgets and science experiments. But with a State Fair, I think it definitely makes room for a whole lot more other stuff. It could be a small booth or it could be as big as a small farm animal pen to show off the stuff that was made. Because sometimes you just need that kind of space to really showcase your stuff. It wouldn't be contained to a small table where a crowd has to maneuver around. So I definitely think a state fair is way more appropriate for STEAM. The reading on the World's Columbian Exhibition also describes the State Fair very well and complements this idea for the Maker movement.

***

XTRA TO SHARE
We're halfway through the semester and many times I am just checking FB or watching YouTube and I just come across some pretty cool Maker stuff that I'd like to share with the class. The problem is I'm not sure when or how to share it cause in class we have an agenda to go through and I've sent out a couple of emails before but I don't want to spam everyone. So here is a little column, I guess you could call it, where I will share some cool stuff I stumbled upon. Hopefully, it would also provide more content for other classmates to comment on for your 300 points! ;)

Today I found this video on YT of a guy on TEDxSydney 2014 who made a clarinet out of a carrot! Amazing! It sounds great too!

Check it out: https://youtu.be/BISrGwN-yH4

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

7. Reflection

REFLECTION
I had heard that 3D printing takes a long time and I did not really know why. But by the end of class, I understood. The way it "printed" was to create layers of fine melted plastic and the larger the surface or thickness, to more layers it will have to make. It's a little bit annoying that it takes so long, but maybe it's because we've been in this digital age for a while and expect things to be 1-click fast. In either case, although I don't see the ways to improve it yet, I do believe the engineers who specialize in this field will eventually figure out how to speed things up over time.

On the flip side, it is pretty cool that I got to print something useful! Unfortunately, it does not fit my current lens caps but I will be getting new camera equipment in the future and I'm sure there will be some time when my lens cap will fit since this is for standard Canon lenses. I also have a photographer friend who uses Canon lenses so she might have some use for it too. In any case, it was very interesting to watch it get made. How fine the plastic is as the printer slowly forms the virtual design into something physical. Definitely giving this another try in the future!


READING SUMMARY
This week's reading and video focuses on Dr. Leah Buechley's talk at the FabLearn Conference. Very interesting indeed. Although I'm not that fond of focusing on this topic again, I do agree with her and appreciate very much that at least she is talking about making the change instead of merely complaining. I believe that if we want to make the Maker movement more diverse, we need to make the change. We in this class are abnormally a majority of women. And that is just fine. It's a start. We need to make more things, both electronic things and other things like ceramics, sewing clothing items, paintings, music, and other less electronic things. And I believe we have been doing so. Maybe not as much as Buechley wishes but Audrey sews, Emily is a writer, Alyssa makes music, and I'm sure they have way more non-electronic makes that I just don't know about. Furthermore, we can personally encourage our female friends, friends of different ethnicities and cause them to realize that they are makers when they talk about their hobbies or the things that they do. It all starts from us. And I believe that is what would work the best. Although giving large talks such as Buechley's have their own function too, I don't know how much it actually does in terms of making individuals realize they can be part of this movement especially when the audience she is talking to already knows about this movement or is involved in this movement in some kind of capacity. In any case, I do totally agree with her and praise her for her boldness in speaking this to the public so enthusiastically.

Lastly, the Makerbridge blog was an enjoyable journey. Although, maybe because of Buechley's talk, I ended up analyzing the blog posts to see what the overall blogs were about. I noticed that there are a lot of blogs just about the Maker Labs around the country, Maker Faires and conferences and Maker events as well as what is making and what defines a maker. Secondly, I found a lot of blogs on 3D printing. Then there are a minority of posts which talk about knitting, baking and other non-technical maker activities. This is a great blog, for sure. But I wonder if people would be drawn to this even more if they saw the activities that they are interested it. People may not be initially interested in understanding what a maker is but I think they would be interested in what kind of projects they can contribute as well as learn from the Maker movement. So perhaps more blogs on people's maker projects which include a wide variety of fields would attract an audience. Not even like my blog which talks about whether baking is a making because this topic is still focused on the definition of making. What about refocusing it more on how my making experience was with learning to bake Challah bread instead of questioning if it is a maker activity or not. Just say that it is a maker activity and people will believe it. In other words, I just don't think that we should bring people into the debate of "what is making", rather, we should bring people into, "this is making and you are a maker because you also make things such as.... And you can help define the maker movement with the things you make." I think 80% of the blogs should be on a variety of projects and 10% on Maker events, and 10% on definitions about Maker activity would be appropriate. This is just my opinion. I do not claim to know the goal and aim of this blog. You can ignore anything I say. But nevertheless, Makerbridge was still fun to peruse.

Monday, October 12, 2015

#56 Guest Blogger @ Makerbridge

Who da guest blogger? Dats right. It's me! Woot!

Lol. Ok, enough with that. I'm so excited! My blog post about making Challah bread was published today on Makerbridge! I'm famous now. (Jk!) If you haven't already read it on my blog, check it out at Makerbridge! If you have already read it, check it out on Makerbridge anyway! The link is below:

http://makerbridge.si.umich.edu/2015/10/baking-a-making/

Thanks for your support, everyone!

Sunday, October 11, 2015

"Not I, But Christ": Artist Statement



ARTIST STATEMENT
As I sat along with a few others in the dimly-lit living room of a friend's home for our regular church home group one Friday night, the elaborate and frequently revisited discussion on the lack of essential lighting in that particular room surfaced yet again. I scrutinized the plain walls around me with the goal of contributing my two cents about the situation. Instantly, I realized that the "paintings of Bible quotes" that I have longed to attempt for so long a time finally has a purpose to be created. I chimed in, "I have been meaning to paint some verses from the Bible anyway, how about I paint a couple of brighter ones for your living room?" My friend was surprised and grateful that I would even consider such a thing. But for me, I was just excited to have a reason to make time for this hobby I've wanted to venture into. I asked him what his favorite Bible verse was and requested that it was short (for the sake of my first attempt) and he quoted me this portion of Galatians 2:20, which is also inscribed in his college class ring.

The essence of this verse is captured by the shortened four-word phrase, "Not I, But Christ". "Not I" (or "No longer I" in the full verse), does not mean an exchanged life whereby Christ comes in and we go out because in the latter half of the verse it says, "I live". The "I" does not leave. Rather, as regenerated people, we have both the old "I", which has been crucified and corresponds to the phrase "Not I", and the new "I", which has God as life added to it and corresponds to "I live". The new "I" came into being when the old "I" was resurrected and God was added to it. So even though Paul, the writer of this verse says, "No longer I who live", he also said, "But it is Christ who lives in me." So it is Christ who lives, but it is in us that He lives. The two, Christ and us, have one life and one living.

As for style, tools, and materials, I wanted to make a two-canvas piece with figure-ground reversal. The style should be bright, clean, and contemporary to fit the olive green tone of his living room and the primary colors of the two canvases would be gold and white. The gold would signify divinity while the white background would be pure and clean to emphasize "Not I, But Christ and nothing else." Since it is fall season where dry leaves are abundant, I decided to go for the fall look which would compliment the gold background of the first canvas as well as the olive green room. Spray paint would be appropriate as it provides an even texture over the entire canvas compared to water color and paint brush. It also fills all the crevices between the stencils and the canvas to ensure clean edges for typography. Because this statement is rather bold, I wanted a bold typeface. It was difficult to find a particular typeface stencil that was cheap so I decided to be resourceful and cut my own with a Silhouette Cameo. For a first attempt, this is very successful and it has been an enjoyable and satisfying experience to see my vision come to life.


***

Below is a before picture of how I used the stencils printed from Silhouette Cameo. The canvas on the right though I ended up peeling off the sticky part and sticking it directly onto the the canvas.



Tuesday, October 6, 2015

6. Reflection

REFLECTION
I really enjoyed the TechBox Tricks exercise we did this morning. It was simple and every one had the same standard pieces to come up with something creative. It was a bit tough at first but I think it was interesting to just play around with what we were given and use them to create something. I only wished we had a bit more time as these kinds of creative things do not always come naturally to me and may require more thought from my brain. I also wish I had the talent to think of something I want to create then use what I have to create it. But I think, for me, that comes from seeing a problem in daily life and then trying to solve it with what I have, instead of just being given a set of tools and being asked to come up with a pitch. One thing I would suggest to not repeat though is asking special guests to award special bonus points to a single student. Don't get me wrong, I am happy for the winner today and have no hard feelings towards them but I would be lying if I said it didn't discourage me a little. It reminded me of the story in AnnMarie Thomas' book about the girl who cried because her teammates yelled at her to not fix the robot mid-race or they'd lose points and how competition does not really benefit learning that much. Rather, it somewhat destroys their passion. I have always grown up (in the typical Asian family) without much praise for my accomplishments and I think that has harbored a character of low self-esteem in me which has been both beneficial in keeping me humble and striving to always learn new things yet detrimental to my overall level of confidence. So when these situations happen, I always feel that I'm not good enough and maybe this just isn't for me. Aside from that though, overall, I still would like to see more of this kind of simple electronics exercise and more time to complete it (Even though I know we were given a time extension already. Lol.)


READING SUMMARY
Charrettes (by Nielson/Norman group) is something I definitely believe is worth investing time in. Practically, it's a brainstorm session and it reminds me very much of IDEO's practices as well. All throughout my summer internship and well into my current part-time job I have always felt a need for a UX team to throw ideas around with me while I am designing the interface for my work projects. Sometimes I do feel stuck in what I'm doing and feel like there is no way out. I just need someone to suggest things to help move the project along even though I may not use their idea entirely or even at all. But it helps for them to just throw out ideas because something might inspire me to think in a particular direction that I have never thought of before and that definitely generates more direction and ideas.

The article from Charrettes Institute is for the most part on the same line as the Nielson/Norman group. I think they are just much more structured in their guidelines. I don't think this is a bad thing. Both types of Charrettes are similar to each other and both work. The structured guideline in this article is definitely helpful, probably based on a lot of past failure and success experiences, and perhaps aimed at making optimal use of the charrettes time. Many of the things they mentioned are also common sense to me. For example, working collaboratively with a cross-functional team is important to encapsulate as many aspects of the work as possible. Another example is working near or on-site is of course much better than working too far away, which makes it not very feasible if there is just one measurement that needed to be double-checked to progress in the charrettes session. Overall, very helpful tips.

The SUNY Albany's reading on critiquing is also very helpful. Everybody has some level of self-love and so everybody loves to talk about themselves and their ideas. The problem is nobody really listens. Listening is a skill that we all need to learn and must continue to learn throughout our lives. If we don't listen, we don't receive what the person is saying. I admit to be lacking in this area many times. Another point I liked is the last, which talks about leaving our ego at the door. This is very difficult to do but it is necessary if we are to improve.

Though I thoroughly enjoyed reading the "How to write an Artist Statement" article, I'm not too sure why we are reading it at this point. I did get the opportunity to read this earlier in the semester when I pitched my painting idea to the professor. Re-reading this I am helped and reminded to write in terms of "I" and not "you". Particularly, I am impressed again with the 4th paragraph of the answer portion, which talks about how the statement expresses the fundamental underpinnings of my art and I should write it for people who want to know more and not for people who already know everything my art is about.


Thursday, October 1, 2015

5. Reflection

REFLECTION
Today in class I was really glad that we got to just jump right into Arduinos. Even though in my previous posts I mentioned how intimidated I was of them, after seeing all the cool things they can do, I was also very excited to learn how to use them.

Andong and I worked together on the 3 projects in Silvia's Super Awesome book and we ran into a few frustrating points. Overall, it was a good experience but that speaker though. It was really loud and somewhat irritating after the initial novelty of getting it to ring wore off. Especially because we did not understand how touching the analog pins was actually changing the sound. Maybe this would have been different had we used a better quality speaker. But anyhow, at least we managed to pull through and I have more confidence moving forward to work on the examples in Getting Started with Arduino.

Here are the links to the videos demonstrating the test and 3 projects we did:
Blink Test: https://youtu.be/1ll5Sa59omM
Strobe Light: https://youtu.be/9e-3WHZXxO4
Riff: https://youtu.be/ue6EnS1Pgtk
Tapper: https://youtu.be/uKi6bC9CSXc


READING SUMMARY
Massimo Banzi's story of how Arduino started from just an idea to eventually becoming what it is today is really inspiring. It seemed that it was not getting much traction for a while until the professor in NY started to see some opportunity for it to develop and grow and eventually bringing it to several smaller manufacturers was also very helpful. But most of all I was quite impressed with how they just kept doing it, they kept developing it, they kept even the hardware open source and I think that is how it became what it became today. In my experience, I find that a lot of people tend to not take the open source approach. Something I made is something I made and how I made it is a secret. It is my success, I'm not sharing it with you. I myself admit to having such a mentality on more than several occasions. But there definitely is a sense of community and mutual ownership when people are able to let go and allow others to participate and eventually the product that you get is so much better than if it was made by only one person. People with different skills and different backgrounds view things in a different way and can build upon these kind of basic and fundamental ideas in order to advance it and make it bigger and reaching even more people. Open-sourcing definitely a very excellent culture and breeding ground for innovation.

Becky Stern's guide to the Lilypad Arduino is also very interesting. I enjoy sewing things and have done quite a bit of it throughout my childhood. The shapeon the Lilipad and its numerous ports definitely make it more versatile to fabric projects compared to the regular Arduinos. However, I fail to see it being useful in a way other than flashing LED banners, flashing bike bag patches, and maybe the kids annual Halloween costume. Perhaps I should look up some more Lilypad projects. But several questions that came to mind include: are the Lilypads (and their battery holder counterparts) washable? Are they machine-washable? My guess is not. Also, the boards are quite large so I would worry about sitting on them or falling on them and they crack or break. So in that sense, I'm thinking that you just made your clothing item something that you can only wear for a limited period of time since you can't wash it without destroying it, which is perfect for the once-a-year Halloween costume and bike backpack but not so much for my everyday socks. Not that I would want my socks to flash anyway. And what if it rains? Sometimes you can't help but ride your bike home in the rain or heavy mist (common SF weather), will that not destroy the lilypad or at least harvest mold on some parts of the circuits of your bike bag? So all in all, though it is pretty cool that you can now attach electronics to your clothes, unfortunately, I still don't see the usefulness or practicality of it.

I was checking out some Arduino projects on Instructables.com and I came across this project: http://www.instructables.com/id/Instagram-Inspired-DIY-Photo-Booth/
and this project:
http://www.instructables.com/id/A-Makers-Wedding-Photo-booth/
I'm just amazed! This is really cool and it would be something I would really like to do if I had all the time in the world. It would take me several months to a coupe of years to really get a project like this completed due to my skill level with wood and electronics. Not to mention the space needed to store this project while it was in progress. That is not something I have right now. But when I have my own home and garage, I would definitely like to have a workspace to make something like this. Just amazing!

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

#46 Super Awesome Sylvia's Arduino Trio

Andong and I paired up to work on Sylvia's Arduino Trio projects. Our demos of the Blink Test and the 3 projects are below:

Blink Test: https://youtu.be/1ll5Sa59omM

Strobe Light: https://youtu.be/9e-3WHZXxO4
Riff: https://youtu.be/ue6EnS1Pgtk
Tapper: https://youtu.be/uKi6bC9CSXc

Monday, September 28, 2015

4. Reflection

REFLECTION
I really enjoyed our squishy circuit activity last Tuesday. Actually, when I was doing the readings last weekend, I was considering making some conductive dough myself on Saturday. I glanced through the ingredients list in the Squishy Circuit book and I had everything in the house to make the squishy circuit dough (minus the food coloring). But due to time, I didn't make it and decided to wait until class. When we were asked to make the squishy pig, I was feeling a little intimidated because I had to think of how circuits work. The only hint was that we would need insulating dough when making the pig but I wasn't sure how they would come together. But after observing how Andong made his "Picasso" pig, I took a few notes. For example, he connected the battery directly to the motor wires, which was something I would not have done on first instinct. But after his explanation, I understood why he did that. Apparently the electrical current was not strong enough to go through the dough to power the motor. When I got home, I tried out several ways to connect the circuit and finally found that only one wire had to be directly connected to the motor while the other can be connected through the dough. That was an interesting discovery.

For my readers' benefit, I am linking my squishy pig video here:
https://youtu.be/kxsMEex4naM

As for the discussion part of class, I found the topic of the day a little repetitive. We were still talking about what defines making, does it include cooking, does it include this and that and I guess I was just expecting us to move on from that topic. Didn't we already establish that in our class we do accept that making does not only revolve around electronics and technology and woodworks type of making? So I was expecting to move on from the "what is making" to more "what did people make" project-based topics. I want to see all the different kinds of projects that makers have made or are making through project videos or articles and tutorials about the kinds of projects done. And to add to my slight disappointment with regards to our discussion topic, we also focused a lot on that one lady who was not happy about being called a maker and we also bashed Mark Hatch's Maker Manifesto, which I actually identified a lot with. Perhaps I'm just interested to learn more about what people make and not so much whether or not what they made is considered a making. Personally, I'm kind of way beyond that point but maybe that's just me.

READING SUMMARY
The readings / videos for this week were really interesting! I'm really excited to start on the Arduino projects now! At the end of last semester, Andong introduced me to Arduinos because he was planning on taking this class. I thought they were really cool but I still didn't know that much about them and what they could do. In my mind, it was like they were just these little motherboards with no particular purpose. In a sense, that's what they are. We, makers, need to find a purpose for them and make them do what we want them to do. This is what I've been learning more and more especially since the start of the semester. Through our readings this week, I'm quite encouraged to see from Massimo Banzi's TED Talk, the different kinds of projects in, around, and outside the house that Arduinos can power and by using so much open source code and hardware. I was personally intimidated by the programming part of Arduinos because even though I have some exposure and experience in programming, they are very limited. I am not a programmer and have never fully enjoyed pure coding and solving multitudes of bugs. A few bugs here and there are fun and makes me feel accomplished but humongous bugs linked to other bugs just makes me so frustrated. Anyhow, through this week's readings, I am now very much excited to come up with a cool and useful project that would solve a problem in the house or would just be plain fun to do (like drones! But I heard they were expensive...). I would love to get started on project #610 Build In Arduino Examples and start learning to use them!

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Saturday, September 19, 2015

3. Reflection

REFLECTION
In last week's class, we watched the Chevrolet makers video and I couldn't help but be reminded about how much maker culture was so much depended on in those days. It was very hands-on, every single item was made individually and it was just their way of living. That was their work. That was their specialty. Every piece was made uniquely. It was because of this kind of maker culture in the previous generations where people hand-carved lazy Susans, handmade teapots and glass jars, baked pies from scratch, etc., that we have a lot of the convenient tools and products we can just buy off the shelf in stores today. Those handmade products in the beginning were the prototypes and eventually they wanted to make things more efficient, make things quicker, and create standardized and equal parts so that they all look the same. So mass production came in to assist there. But because of wanting to increase efficiency in this way and replacing man with machinery, we who are born in today's convenient age have lost some sense of the maker culture today. Back then, maker culture was out of necessity, a lifestyle, but today, it seems to me that maker culture is almost regarded as just a hobby or something that not everybody has to do. It's as if not everybody has to be a maker and we'll still live comfortably, which may be true but is also sad. I believe that in order to continue to provide for our society today, mass production is necessary. However, in order to progress in terms of innovation and creating new things to fit the ever-changing needs of people, there is a need to keep and grow the maker culture.

READING SUMMARY
I felt that this week's readings had somewhat conflicting views of what the maker culture is. Mark Hatch in The Maker Movement Manifesto presents a list of rules for what a maker is or does. His point of view is very much that everyone is a maker and that makers make anything. I do agree with this view. I also gather the sense (after reading Making It and Why I Am Not a Maker) that he still focuses very much on electronic, metal, wood, plastic, and (the most feminine of all) sewing projects and mentions nothing about cooking, drawing, painting, etc.. Maybe these "manly" projects emphasized are just his interests and he forgets to mention the more feminine projects, which though he includes, does not mention as frequently due to lack of experience or interest. In any case, this distinction is not important. He does push a little more on taking classes and learning and picking up skills in order to use tools to help make your projects. This thought I agree with but to a certain extent. It is definitely helpful to learn and pick up these skills and no doubt taking classes is a speedier and more formal way to do so. It's kind of what we are doing in our class too. We are taking a Makerspaces class to exercise our interest as makers and learn to make new things and pick up new skills. But I was also thinking, perhaps he is also doing so to promote his TechShop? We won't know for sure.

In contrast, Debbie Chachra in Why I Am Not a Maker seems to be upset about how the whole "maker" identifier assumes to primarily include male-dominant activities producing materialistic products and rejects the more traditional, feminine roles such as care-giving. Perhaps I am just reading too much into it but her writing, to me, implies that because "maker culture" is so male-domain focused, she refuses to be identified with this culture and therefore denies that she is a maker. To be honest, we need to forget about that. Yes, I agree there is frequently an implication accompanied with the term "maker" that you are producing something material and tangible. But that is because we humans are very materialistic beings. We need to see, touch, feel results, which, the most tangible of all, are physical products or at least virtually packaged units of code or media (like films). But you can also make events, make makers through educating, make philosophy through analyzing, make better people through care-giving. It really doesn't have to be a "thing" and we are not regarding people as objects of our manipulation. Regardless, everyone always affects everyone through actions, words, thoughts, intentions. It's just a matter of big or small. And that is what I call "making" a person.

Then, this whole "which male and female activities are considered part of maker culture" is just a big fuss. You can code if you are a girl and you can sew if you are a boy. That's okay. Perhaps it's not emphasized that way because we were created differently by God. Adam was created first and the Eve was made out of Adam's rib to be his helper. Already, you see that there is a difference since the very beginning. It's innate. We were created and born this way. Call me old-fashioned, or anti-feminist, or whatever. Men and women are different. That is a fact. But even so, I am not saying that women can never make what men make nor that men should never make what women make. No. Men and women can make whatever they want to make. We just have natural tendencies for men to lean towards male-domain activities and women towards female-domain activities and it is just currently emphasized that way in the media. And that is okay. If she would like to change that, then she should make something in the female-domain that is not necessarily physical (such as care-giving and educating) and write about how it is part of the maker culture instead. I just don't think our time should be focused on these minor male/female issues. Rather, we should be focusing on what we (both male and female collectively) are making, how we are making it, and how it contributes to society.

In Making It, I find it somewhat difficult to understand what Evgeny Morozov's main point is. Hopefully, this will be unravelled more in class. But what struck me was in the later part of his article where he pointed out that there is an inequality of opportunity on online platforms to support maker products even though we might at first assume the opposite. He also mentions how Kickstarter has now diminished the need for formal large corporation investors yet how Kickstarter is more useful only when you have a multitude of Twitter followers compared to only a handful.

With regards to the Squishy Circuits tutorial, I think it was an excellent, very easy to read book for teenagers. I am even considering doing this with the kids at my church on Sundays during craft time since it is relatively simple to make! The only thing I feel is a little lacking is the tutorial about the battery pack. It mentions briefly about soldering the wires to the terminals but it doesn't tell me what kind of wires they are (they are just described as y-shaped metal wires). It also doesn't show me which part of the battery holder I am soldering the wires to. But overall, this makes me very excited to try it out in class this week and try out different things I can do with it!

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

#801 LED Flashlight Hack



I explained pretty much everything in my video but I will also write a few short paragraphs here on the blog.

Basically, I discovered a problem in the original LED flashlight project we did in class, that is, you have to constantly press and hold down on the battery in order for the LED to stay lighted up and many times, I don't want to have to keep one hand on the flashlight at all times. I would like to keep both hands free and even be able to place the flashlight on a surface while I do what I need to do.

So in this hack, I used some pieces of tape attached to the back of the battery and pulled through the foam on the front. The foam is sturdy enough so it actually holds the tape in its position. When I pull on the tape from the front, the battery, which was hovering above the LED's positive leg, gets pulled down to touch the leg and completes the circuit, making the LED light up and stays lighted up because the tape is held in that position by the foam. To turn it off, I push the tape slightly back into the foam and the LEDs will turn off and remain off.

Additional benefits I did not show in the video:
The sturdy foam also allows the flashlight to remain upright, which makes it a "handsfree" flashlight. If you also notice in the video, the white LED is directly facing the front while the red and orange LEDs on the other end are facing the sides. So you could place the flashlight on its side so that the white LED flashes the brightest or you could also place the flashlight face down in tighter spaces (such as under the couch) so that the red and orange LEDs light up from the sides.

Monday, September 14, 2015

Baking, a making?

To make or not to make...?

That is not the question. The more suitable question is: Is baking a kind of making?

Last Saturday, I took a Bake with Zing class with my housemate at Zingerman's Bake House. It was a class that taught how to make Zingerman's soft and rich challah bread (pronounced "ha-lah" not "cha-lah"). The day before this class, I thought, hey, I'm learning something new, right? I've never made bread before and I don't really know how to. And here I am, finding ways to learn how to make a particular kind of bread (albeit, a slightly expensive way $100!, but still). So isn't this a "maker" activity for me? Well, we'll find out by the end of this blog. But first, I would like to go through what actually happened in the class.

When we arrived in the classroom at Zingerman's, there were ingredients such as the flour, yeast, eggs, oil, water, honey, and salt already measured and laid out for us at each of our assigned seats. After Dan, the teacher, finished explaining some of the facts of protein and a round of introduction, he began to demonstrate how to make the challah bread, pouring in the ingredients as he explained. While he was doing this, I thought, hmm.... It would have been nice if I could've started the entire process from scratch. Of course, it would have been complicated and more time-consuming to have each person crack their own eggs and measure their own water but at the same time, I felt a slight lack in my learning for not being able to do that myself. In any case, we began by pouring in the prepared ingredients as instructed. And then came the part where I felt like I learned the most. We had to form the mixture into a dough by kneading the sticky pile for about 5 minutes. At first, it was difficult because the dough was just sticking all over my hands and fingers and scraping it off was not only difficult but also seemed kind of gross. But as the instructor and his assistant made their rounds, they would give us tips about technique and a small demonstration with our dough. They encouraged using the palm of the hand, not the fingers, pushing the dough closely parallel to the kneading surface with quick motions. Totally NOT what I was doing. When I got the hang of it, the dough shaped up pretty nicely and it was very gratifying to see the result of what I did.





While the bread was left to rise, the next step was to learn how to braid (for the 5- and 6-braided challah). We were first taught with rope (alongside our formula sheets) to learn the technique and then eventually applied the learned technique to our actual dough. This was interesting. The rope obviously did not have the same stretchy texture as the dough, so we had to tug on the rope much harder to tighten the braid compared to when we were working with the dough. The braid was confusing because each strand was replacing the strand it crossed over. But again, once we got the hang of it, it was also gratifying to see a beautifully patterned braid. I also felt extra proud when the instructor took my braids and said, "Wow, you did this one really good," as he unknotted it for the next person to try.




After we completed rope practice, our dough had risen enough. There was a quick demonstration again and we were then tasked with making a turban and slicing the other two loaves into 5 and 6 pieces (depending on which braid we were working on) and rolling them into these fat long strands with very thin ends. These strands were then grouped together at the ends and we were ready to start braiding. The dough was in some ways easier and in some ways harder to work with compared to the rope. The dough gave in to our manipulation way easier than the rope but it was also slightly harder to control. I had to make sure I wasn't pulling too hard or too little because if I pulled too hard, the strands would become really thin but if I pulled too lightly, the dough would just spring back into its original place (because of the glutten). After a few rounds of the braiding formula, my braid was egg washed and ready. It looked so neat and pretty! Neat things make me feel so happy and accomplished.





Finally, the last step was to let it proof, egg wash a second time, and into the oven it goes! This part of my learning process was also slightly disappointing as the assistant did every thing for us. We were told how to tell when the dough was under-proofed, over-proofed, or proofed enough but we were not given the opportunity to test our own dough. The assistant also egg washed them the second time for us, put it in the oven, and even watched it all on our behalf to see when it was ready to come out. Not really what I was hoping for.

In the end, we got our breads. I still feel really proud of myself. And I asked myself again: is baking a making? My answer is yes and no. If I were to learn to make this on my own at home, baking is definitely a type of making because there would have been way more failures and mistakes to learn from compared to being in the class. However, in the context of my experience described, I would say, the class overall was not really a making experience since many things were prepared and done for us and I can't entirely say that I made it all by myself. The class was built to be a success (otherwise, no one would want to take it). If I were to compare this in-class experience with the maker identifications in AnnMarie Thomas' book Making Makers: Kids, Tools, and Innovation, there was very little room for experimenting (although that does not stifle curiosity, but it also does not satisfy it) and little room for risk. However, specifically related to learning technique, I would say, it definitely was a making experience. I did learn to knead dough. I did learn to braid challah bread. I was responsible for my own dough and had to make a decision whether to use that one strand that fell to the floor while I was rolling it (5 second rule, I promise!). Much knowledge was not only shared by the instructors but even contributed by fellow students with more experience while questions were supplied by less-experienced students. Sure, this may not have been the cheapest way to learn how to make bread but I would not say it was not resourceful. Just as online instructions are a resource, in-person classes are also a resource. 

Lastly, I believe touch, texture, and reiteration are all essential in the learning process. Actually being able to feel the sticky dough as we were kneading it, correcting our hand technique after receiving instruction from the assistant and then repeating the process with this new technique taught me how to tell when the dough was ready and when the dough needed more kneading. I did receive a lot more help than if I were to try making this on my own at home but I did make it and I did learn from making it. If anything, this class sped up my learning process and equipped me with the basic skills to advance my future maker activities in baking.